Today’s newspapers are preoccupied with released material from the National Archives for 1982, focusing on two separate issues – the then Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s role and understanding on the Falklands Island conflict; and her personal relationship with Jimmy Savile.
Hearing this, the blogger, who worked on several charity events with the late Sir Jimmy Savile (at that time known only as a celebrity charity fund-raiser), rushed straight to the archives to follow through one of the stories concerning Sir Jimmy and Baroness Thatcher.
A year before Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher left office, and the same period of time before she authorised his knighthood, Jimmy Savile sat in my North Yorkshire kitchen to drink tea. Sutton Bank was blocked and traffic coiled back from the village below up into the mists of the Hambletons. Jimmy Savile, in training, had run up the bank, a mile of hillside rising 800 feet up a one-in-four incline. It was not long into the New Year and he had recently returned from spending time with the Prime Minister.
How the conversation turned to the Falkland Islands I cannot now recall. Jimmy Savile declared that he had been in Margaret Thatcher’s company at Chequers on Sunday 2nd May 1982. Whilst walking together, and on receipt of a note, her face had turned ashen. Jimmy Savile looked at her with concern, “What’s the matter, Margaret”, he said. ” The Belgrano has been sunk”, was her reply.
And so I darted to the released archives to check the authenticity of the tale. Was Jimmy Savile with the Thatchers at Chequers that fateful afternoon? Why was he there? Did he witness this moment? And did he really say, to her clear annoyance, “Well, it wasn’t there for fishing, was it”?
Fascinatingly, did Margaret Thatcher subsequently repeat this comment as her own – in the Palace of Westminster, the privacy of Downing Street or elsewhere?
The archives are silent, as is Hansard. The players, Jimmy Savile, Dennis Thatcher and Margaret Thatcher are no longer in a position to comment. Perhaps a junior aide may have some memory of the moment? But the tale tells of an establishment familiarity that preceded and followed the Savile phenomenon, whatever its merits – or serious detractions.